|
19 July
2001
Linear Reasoning
by Bob
Jeter
Bypassing
complex controls results in faster, simpler, less expensive
designs.
Linear drive systems offering both automatic reversal of the
traversing nut and the ability to adjust speed almost invariably
require a variety of sometimes costly components. These include
control systems, sensors, clutches, encoders, reversible variable-speed
motors, and gearboxes. Training personnel to operate these systems
further adds to the overall investment. What's more, equipment
investment and maintenance is a specialized business requiring
skilled technicians and labor.
Is a Traditional Solution Justified?
The popular consideration set for linear actuators in linear
motion systems includes traditional solutions that have been
around since the Industrial Revolution. These include ball
screws, pneumatic systems, hydraulics, timing belts, and other
methods. An OEM designer can consume considerable design time
configuring the controls for a routine linear motion system
employing any of these technologies.
For example, a ball screw (Figure 1)
has to be stopped to reverse the traversing nut's direction.
This requires you (the designer) to incorporate controls,
sensors, gears, and other accessories. You'll also need a
reversible motor. Additionally, the screw's threads can become
clogged, causing the system to jam. Avoiding this often requires
using a protective bellows assembly, which adds to design
costs and limits space.
Likewise, other traditional linear motion technologies require
both you and the end user to accept "extras" that can increase
costs and reduce the overall operation's productivity. Timing
belts require servo/stepping motors, switches, encoders, sensors,
and programmable logic controllers. Pneumatic systems pose
design space limitationstwice the stroke distance is
required per piston. Hydraulic systems entail complicated
mechanics and electronics, as well as multispeed, direct-braked
motors, pumps, and solenoids. Moreover, cleaning up after
leaks can become an ongoing maintenance issue.
In short, the investment in a linear motion system can be
significant. Such an investment is justified for some operationsfor
example, batch control processes, precision machine tool applications,
and other high-accuracy procedures.
Seek Alternatives When Indicated
For the most part, linear motion professionals are used to
linear motion systems, which include expensive, maintenance-intensive
components such as variable-speed, direct-braked motors, valves,
and solenoids; gear-head assemblies; and motion control systems.
They've accepted the downtime required for procedures such
as changing gear heads and basic maintenance. The time and
costs are simply figured into the production plan.
However, for production processes involving repetitive, reciprocating
motion procedures (e.g., spooling/winding, slitting, or spraying),
the operating and maintenance costs associated with traditionally
developed linear motion systems can be avoided. You can design
a simpler system that meets application requirements and saves
money.
One of the least likely places to begin looking for alternatives
is with the linear actuator. Yet this is where you may find
your most economical and efficient alternative solution.
For example, "rolling-ring" linear actuators operate on a
mechanical principle that creates efficient reciprocating
linear motionwith autoreverse and variable pitch (linear
speed)but doesn't depend on complex, expensive controls
(Figure 2). This reduces design time
and costs, enhancing profitability. Many reciprocating and
positioning linear motion applications can benefit from rolling-ring
engineering.
A Justifiable Alternative
Rolling-ring linear actuators impart several basic benefits:
elimination of complex, electronic controls, clutches, cams,
and gears; ease of operation and maintenance; and improved
productivity derived from longer periods of continued operation
of production equipment.
In a rolling-ring linear actuator, the rotation of a smooth,
unthreaded shaft is converted into linear output. Within the
actuator housing, a series of "rolling-ring bearings" with
specially contoured inner race surfaces maintains continuous
contact with the drive shaft. When the shaft is rotated, and
the ring assembly is angled on the shaft, the inner races
bear against the shaft. This causes the assembly to essentially
"roll" along the shaft, generating linear movement from the
motor's rotary input (Figure 3).
Certain models of rolling-ring linear actuators require only
a single-speed, unidirectional motor to provide reversible
linear motion with variable pitch. These motors are significantly
less expensive than their reversible, direct-braked, variable-speed
counterparts.
In many instances, a rolling-ring linear actuator permits
both reversing direction and adjusting pitch without slowing
or stopping the system. Production rates can therefore be
maintained at a higher level than with a system that requires
routine shutdowns for adjustments or maintenance.
Depending on the make and model, rolling-ring linear actuators
provide up to 800 pounds of axial thrust. Travel length is
up to 16 feet at speeds of up to 13 feet per second. Accuracy
varies from within ±0.005 inches to ±0.0004 inches.
A rolling-ring linear actuator's dynamic shaft/bearing interface
is virtually backlash free because there are no gaps between
the bearing surface and the shaft. In many instances, rolling-ring
technology reduces design time because it bypasses the need
for complex, costly controls.
Operating (training) and maintenance expenses are also reduced.
Rolling-ring linear actuators require no special training,
and the only maintenance needed is periodic lubrication of
the drive shaft. Furthermore, because the drive shaft has
no threads, the system remains virtually clog free. The cost
of fabricating a bellows assembly is eliminated. Finally,
in case of overload, rolling-ring linear actuators "slip"
rather than jam. This protects the system from "churning"
and protects valuable system components from damage.
Designing with rolling-ring linear actuators reduces the
time you invest. Bypassing complex controls results in faster,
simpler, less expensive projects. For many linear motion applications,
rolling-ring linear actuators are worth a look. They may make
some of your linear motion applications less costly and more
efficient.
If you consider using a rolling-ring linear drive, make certain
you're working with a company that has proven experience with
this technology. Conversion from ball bearings to the rolling-ring
variety is a precise procedure. Only experienced rolling-ring
manufacturers have the machining expertise required. Additionally,
the rolling-ring provider you select should provide expert
design engineering assistance matched to your application
requirements. MC
|